1.西南交通大学 牵引动力国家重点实验室 四川 成都 610031
2.中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710043
王波(1988—),男,博士,研究主向为车辆系统动力学。
扫 描 看 全 文
王波, 罗世辉, 汪科任, 等. 不同磁轨关系对中低速磁浮车辆垂向动力学性能的影响[J]. 机车电传动, 2019,(5):82-86.
Bo WANG, Shihui LUO, Keren WANG, et al. Influence of Different Magnet-track Relations on Vertical Dynamic Performance of Medium-low Speed Maglev Vehicles[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2019,(5):82-86.
王波, 罗世辉, 汪科任, 等. 不同磁轨关系对中低速磁浮车辆垂向动力学性能的影响[J]. 机车电传动, 2019,(5):82-86. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2019.05.018.
Bo WANG, Shihui LUO, Keren WANG, et al. Influence of Different Magnet-track Relations on Vertical Dynamic Performance of Medium-low Speed Maglev Vehicles[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2019,(5):82-86. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2019.05.018.
为分析中低速磁浮车辆在直线段上2种不同磁轨关系的动力学性能的差异,分别采用弹簧阻尼法和悬浮控制法建立磁轨关系模型,分析2种磁轨关系力学特性,对采用PID控制的悬浮控制法的悬浮刚度和阻尼进行等效处理,并转换成弹簧阻尼法中的线性刚度和阻尼。通过仿真分析发现:2种模型在直线段的垂向平稳性、车体和构架的垂向加速度相差很小,有相近的计算精度;悬浮力最大值和3,б,统计值相差很小,均不超过0.2 kN。因此,在计算中低速磁浮车辆直线动力学性能时,弹簧阻尼模型可以替代悬浮控制模型。
In order to analyze the difference of dynamic performance between two different kinds of maglev tracks on the straight line of a medium-low speed maglev vehicle, the spring damping method and the suspension control method were used to establish the relationship model of the maglev tracks, and the mechanical characteristics of the two kinds of maglev tracks were analyzed. The suspension stiffness and damping of the suspension control method controlled by PID were treated equivalently and converted into linear stiffness and damping in spring damping method. Through simulation analysis, it was found that the vertical stationary of the two models in the straight line segment, the vertical acceleration difference between the car body and the frame is very small, and the calculation accuracy is similar; the difference between the maximum suspension force and the 3,б, statistic value is very small, and the difference is not more than 0.2 kN. Therefore, the spring damping model can replace the suspension control model in calculating the linear dynamic performance of medium-low speed maglev vehicles.
磁浮车辆悬浮控制弹簧阻尼磁轨关系动力学性能中低速磁浮车辆
maglev vehiclesuspension control methodspring damping methodmaglev track relationdynamic performancemedium-low speed maglev vehicle
LEE H W, KIM K C, JU L. Review of maglev train technologies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2006, 42(7): 1917-1925.
吴祥明. 磁浮列车[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2003: 1-21.
彭奇彪. 中低速磁悬浮交通系统技术及工程应用[J]. 机车电传动, 2014 (3): 6-9.
REN S, ROMEIJN A, KLAP K. Dynamic simulation of the maglev vehicle/guideway system[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15(3): 269-278.
SHI J, WANG Y J. Dynamic response analysis of single-span guideway caused by high speed maglev train[J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2011, 8(3): 213-228.
赵春发, 翟婉明, 蔡成标. 磁浮车辆/高架桥垂向耦合动力学研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2001, 23(5): 27-33.
鲍佳. 磁浮列车悬浮控制与动力学仿真[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011.
邓永权, 罗世辉, 梁红琴, 等. 基于SIMPACK的磁悬浮车辆耦合动力学性能仿真模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2007, 7(1): 12-15.
汪科任, 罗世辉, 宗凌潇, 等. 新型磁浮车动力学仿真分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(20): 23-29.
MA Weihua, SONG Rongrong, XU Junqi, et al. A coupling vibration test bench and the simulation research of a maglev vehicle[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015 (2): 1-14.
LEE J S, KWON S D, KIM M Y, et al. A parametric study on the dynamics of urban transit maglev vehicle running on flexible guideway bridges[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 328(3): 301-317.
翟婉明, 赵春发. 磁浮车辆/轨道系统动力学(Ⅰ)—磁/轨相互作用及稳定性[J]. 机械工程学报, 2005, 41(7): 1-10.
赵春发, 翟婉明. 磁浮车辆/轨道系统动力学(Ⅱ)—建模与仿真[J]. 机械工程学报, 2005, 41(8): 163-175.
叶学艳, 赵春发, 翟婉明. 低速磁浮车辆动力学建模与导向机构仿真分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2007, 7(3): 6-10.
赵春发. 磁悬浮车辆系统动力学研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2004.
0
浏览量
3
下载量
0
CSCD
16
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构