浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.西南交通大学 牵引动力国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
2.中车株洲电力机车有限公司,湖南 株洲 412001
3.大功率交流传动电力机车系统集成国家重点实验室,湖南;株洲 412001
赵春发(1973—),男,博士,研究方向为轨道交通工程动力学;E-mail: cfzhao@swjtu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2022-07-10,
收稿日期:2022-01-21,
修回日期:2022-03-31,
扫 描 看 全 文
和风, 冯洋, 佟来生, 等. 高速磁浮车辆通过平面曲线时悬浮架和电磁铁的弹性变形分析[J]. 机车电传动, 2022,(4):1-8.
HE Feng, FENG Yang, TONG Laisheng, et al. Elastic deformation analysis of the levitation bogie and the electromagnet of high-speed maglev vehicle running over the plane curve[J]. Electric drive for locomotives, 2022,(4):1-8.
和风, 冯洋, 佟来生, 等. 高速磁浮车辆通过平面曲线时悬浮架和电磁铁的弹性变形分析[J]. 机车电传动, 2022,(4):1-8. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128X.2022.04.103.
HE Feng, FENG Yang, TONG Laisheng, et al. Elastic deformation analysis of the levitation bogie and the electromagnet of high-speed maglev vehicle running over the plane curve[J]. Electric drive for locomotives, 2022,(4):1-8. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128X.2022.04.103.
为掌握高速磁浮车辆悬浮电磁铁和悬浮架的弹性变形特性,建立考虑悬浮电磁铁和悬浮架柔性的高速磁浮车辆刚柔耦合动力学模型,仿真分析了5种悬浮电磁铁抗弯刚度和3种平面曲线(曲线半径分别为650 m,1 000 m,4 000 m)条件下悬浮电磁铁和悬浮架的弹性变形。结果表明,悬浮电磁铁在半径1 000 m曲线上变形最大,当其抗弯刚度由现有设计值减小50%后,一位悬浮电磁铁的动态整体变形幅值由0.49 mm增大到0.82 mm,该值相对于10 mm的额定悬浮间隙而言较大,二位悬浮电磁铁的动态整体变形幅值由0.11 mm增至0.23 mm;增大悬浮电磁铁的抗弯刚度,其动态变形近似线性减小;在缓和曲线上悬浮架跟随轨道扭转而扭转,在缓和曲线中点处扭转角最大,头车一位悬浮架的扭转角总是小于二位悬浮架。整体而言,悬浮电磁铁的抗弯刚度对悬浮架扭转变形影响较小,对一位悬浮架托臂的弹性变形有一定影响,而对二位悬浮架托臂影响甚小。
In order to grasp the elastic deformation characteristics of levitation electromagnet and levitation bogie of high-speed maglev vehicle
a rigid-flexible coupling dynamic model of high-speed maglev vehicle considering the flexibility of levitation electromagnet and levitation bogie was established. The elastic deformation of levitation electromagnet and levitation bogie under the five kinds of levitation electromagnet bending stiffness and three kinds of plane curves ( radius is 650 m
1 000 m and 4 000 m ) was simulated and analyzed. The results show that the deformation of the levitation electromagnet is the largest on the curve of radius at 1 000 m. When the bending stiffness of the levitation electromagnet decreases by 50% from the existing design value
the dynamic overall deformation amplitude of the first levitation electromagnet increases from 0.49 mm to 0.82 mm
which is larger than the rated suspension clearance of 10 mm
and the overall deformation amplitude of the second levitation electromagnet increases from 0.11 mm to 0.23 mm. With the increase of the bending stiffness of the levitation electromagnet
the dynamic deformation decreases approximately linearly. The levitation bogie twists along the track on the mitigation curve
and the torsion angle is the largest at the midpoint of the mitigation curve. The torsion angle of the first levitation bogie is always less than that of the second levitation bogie. Overall
the bending stiffness of the levitation electromagnet has little effect on the torsional deformation of the levitation bogie
and has a certain effect on the elastic deformation of the first levitation bogie bracket
and has little effect on the second levitation bogie bracket.
磁浮列车悬浮架电磁铁曲线通过刚柔耦合动力学弹性变形仿真
maglev trainlevitation bogieelectromagnetcurve negotiationrigid-flexible coupled dynamicselastic deformationsimulation
吴祥明. 磁浮列车[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2003.
WU Xiangming. Maglev train[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2003.
ZHAO C F, ZHAI W M. Maglev vehicle/guideway vertical random response and ride quality[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2002, 38(3): 185-210.
施晓红, 佘龙华. 磁浮系统多控制器动态解耦特性仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006, 18(7): 1954-1957.
SHI Xiaohong, SHE Longhua. Dynamic uncoupling capability simulation of multi-controllers maglev system[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006, 18(7): 1954-1957.
施晓红, 佘龙华. 单悬浮架多控制器耦合磁悬浮系统动态特性研究[J]. 机车电传动, 2006(1): 43-45.
SHI Xiaohong, SHE Longhua. Study on dynamic characteristics of maglev system with single maglev frame and multi-controller coupling[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2006(1): 43-45.
赵春发, 翟婉明, 叶学艳. 高速磁浮车辆弹性悬浮架动力学建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(20): 5718-5721.
ZHAO Chunfa, ZHAI Wanming, YE Xueyan. Dynamic modeling and simulation of high-speed maglev vehicle and its elastic levitation chassis[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(20): 5718-5721.
邹东升, 佘龙华. 高速磁浮列车电磁铁安装结构的动力学建模与分析[J]. 铁道学报, 2008, 30(4): 89-92.
ZOU Dongsheng, SHE Longhua. Dynamic analysis on the magnet fixing structure of the high speed maglev vehicle[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2008, 30(4): 89-92.
万鹏, 翟婉明, 王开云. 考虑轮对弹性时车辆运动稳定性分析[J]. 铁道车辆, 2008, 46(6): 8-10.
WAN Peng, ZHAI Wanming, WANG Kaiyun. Analysis of running stability of vehicles with the consideration of wheelset elasticity[J]. Rolling Stock, 2008, 46(6): 8-10.
陈新华, 黄志辉, 卜继玲. 基于ANSYS与SIMPACK联合仿真的柔性轮对动力学仿真分析[J]. 机车电传动, 2014(2): 41-45.
CHEN Xinhua, HUANG Zhihui, BU Jiling. Dynamics simulation analysis of flexible wheelset based on ANSYS and SIMPACK[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2014(2): 41-45.
刘韦, 马卫华, 罗世辉, 等. 考虑轮对弹性的车轮振动及车轮多边形化对轮轨力影响研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35(6): 28-34.
LIU Wei, MA Weihua, LUO Shihui, et al. Research on influence of wheel vibration and wheel polygonization on wheel-rail force in consideration of wheelset elasticity[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(6): 28-34.
BAEZA L, FAYOS J, RODA A, et al. High frequency railway vehicle-track dynamics through flexible rotating wheelsets[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2008, 46(7): 647-659.
杨云帆, 周青, 巩磊, 等. 轮对柔性对直线电机车辆动态响应的影响分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(6): 1313-1319.
YANG Yunfan, ZHOU Qing, GONG Lei, et al. Influence of wheelset flexibility on dynamic response of linear induction motor vehicles[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(6): 1313-1319.
刘鹏飞, 刘红军, 高昊, 等. 铁路重载货车轮对弹性振动及其动态影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(1): 90-98.
LIU Pengfei, LIU Hongjun, GAO Hao, et al. Elastic vibration of wheelset and its dynamic effect on railway heavy-haul freight wagon[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 90-98.
罗英昆, 赵春发, 梁鑫, 等. 小半径竖曲线上磁浮车辆空气弹簧动态响应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(17): 99-105.
LUO Yingkun, ZHAO Chunfa, LIANG Xin, et al. Dynamic responses of air-spring suspension of a maglev vehicle negotiating a small-radius vertical curved track[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(17): 99-105.
梁鑫, 赵春发, 罗英昆, 等. 高速磁浮车辆通过小半径竖曲线时的动力学响应分析[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2020, 40(4): 1-5.
LIANG Xin, ZHAO Chunfa, LUO Yingkun, et al. Dynamic analysis on high-speed maglev vehicle negotiating a small-radius vertical curve track[J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2020, 40(4): 1-5.
国家铁路局. 磁浮铁路技术标准(试行): TB 10630—2019[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2019.
National Railway Administration of People's Republic of China. Standard for technology of maglev railway (trial): TB 10630—2019[S]. Beijing: China Railway Press, 2019.
李云钢, 常文森. 磁浮列车悬浮系统的串级控制[J]. 自动化学报, 1999, 25(2): 247-251.
LI Yungang, CHANG Wensen. Cascade control of an EMS maglev vehicle's levitation control system[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 1999, 25(2): 247-251.
刘恒坤, 常文森. 磁悬浮列车的双环控制[J]. 控制工程, 2007, 14(2): 198-200.
LIU Hengkun, CHANG Wensen. Double-loop control of maglev train[J]. Control Engineering of China, 2007, 14(2): 198-200.
0
浏览量
49
下载量
0
CSCD
1
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构