浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.太原科技大学 机械工程学院,山西 太原 030024
2.中车大同电力机车有限公司 技术中心,山西 大同;037038
章 新(1981—),男,博士,讲师,研究方向为阻尼减振降噪技术;E-mail: zhangxinbox@126.com
纸质出版日期:2022-07-10,
收稿日期:2021-08-31,
修回日期:2022-05-30,
扫 描 看 全 文
章新, 李建伟, 史青录, 等. 液压减振器双向比对机车动力学性能影响研究[J]. 机车电传动, 2022,(4):117-123.
ZHANG Xin, LI Jianwei, SHI Qinglu, et al. Study the influence of hydraulic shock absorber bidirectional ratio on dynamic performance of locomotive[J]. Electric drive for locomotives, 2022,(4):117-123.
章新, 李建伟, 史青录, 等. 液压减振器双向比对机车动力学性能影响研究[J]. 机车电传动, 2022,(4):117-123. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128X.2022.04.017.
ZHANG Xin, LI Jianwei, SHI Qinglu, et al. Study the influence of hydraulic shock absorber bidirectional ratio on dynamic performance of locomotive[J]. Electric drive for locomotives, 2022,(4):117-123. DOI: 10.13890/j.issn.1000-128X.2022.04.017.
为研究机车悬挂系统液压减振器双向比对机车动力学性能的影响,以某六轴宽轨机车为对象,利用Simpack软件建立了主要由车体、构架和轮对三大部分构成,共计90个自由度的车辆动力学模型,其中嵌入了减振器的非线性阻尼特性。在AAR 5级轨道谱的随机激励下,分别对减振器双向比大于1、等于1和小于1的阻尼模型所对应的机车动力学性能进行仿真分析。结果表明:当一系垂向减振器双向比为1时,直线工况下的机车垂向Sperling平稳性指标为3.08,加速度功率谱密度最大为0.11 m
2
/s
3
,均小于双向比不为1的阻尼模型,能更有效衰减传递到车体的振动;在直线工况和车速小于100 km/h的条件下,减振器双向比等于1时一系悬挂装置和二系悬挂装置的垂向动荷系数均最小,但车速大于100 km/h时却不是最小;对于减振器双向比为1的阻尼模型,曲线工况下的机车抗脱轨系数和二系悬挂装置垂向动荷系数相比双向比不为1时更优,但一系悬挂装置垂向动荷系数值却最大;当二系横向减振器双向比为1时,机车非线性临界速度最大值达到263 km/h,均高于双向比不为1时的非线性临界速度。研究可为机车悬挂系统的设计提供一定的参考。
In order to study the influence of bidirectional ratio of hydraulic shock absorber in locomotive suspension system on locomotive dynamic performance
a vehicle dynamic model with 90 degrees of freedom was established by using Simpack software
which consisted of body
frame
wheelset etc. The nonlinear damping characteristics of shock absorber were embedded. Under random excitation of AAR 5 track spectrum
the locomotive dynamic performance corresponding to the damping model with two-way ratio of shock absorber greater than
equal to and less than 1 was simulated and analyzed respectively. The results show that: When the bidirectional ratio of primary vertical shock absorbers is 1
the vertical Sperling stability index of the locomotive under linear working condition is 3.08
and the maximum acceleration power spectral density is 0.11 m
2
/s
3
both of which are smaller than the damping model with bidirectional ratio not 1
and the vibration transmission to the car body is more effectively attenuated. The vertical dynamic load coefficients of the primary and secondary suspension systems are minimum when the bidirectional ratio of the shock absorber is equal to 1
but they are not minimum when the vehicle speed is greater than 100 km/h. For the damping model with bidirectional ratio of 1
the anti-derailment coefficient of the locomotive and the vertical dynamic load coefficient of the secondary suspension device under curving conditions are better than that with bidirectional ratio greater than 1 or less than 1
but the vertical dynamic load coefficient of the primary suspension device is the largest. When the bidirectional ratio of the secondary transverse shock absorber is 1
the maximum nonlinear critical speed of the locomotive reaches 263 km/h
which is higher than that when the bidirectional ratio is greater than or less than 1. The research can provide some reference for the design of locomotive suspension system.
六轴机车动力学减振器阻尼双向比轨道不平顺电力机车
six-axis locomotivedynamicsshock absorberdampingbidirectional ratiotrack irregularityelectric locomotive
LI Xia, YANG Tao, ZHANG Jian, et al. Rail wear on the curve of a heavy haul line—Numerical simulations and comparison with field measurements[J]. Wear, 2016, 366/367: 131-138.
李春胜, 罗世辉, COLE C, 等. 一系悬挂对重载货车运行影响研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(8): 52-59.
LI Chunsheng, LUO Shihui, COLE C, et al. Evaluation of primary suspension benefits for heavy haul wagons[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(8): 52-59.
王晨, 罗世辉, 樊慧, 等. 高原机车悬挂方案对车辆振动特性的影响[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2018, 38(3): 583-589.
WANG Chen, LUO Shihui, FAN Hui, et al. Influence of plateau locomotive suspension structure on vehicle vibration characteristics[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2018, 38(3): 583-589.
周素霞, 卢术娟, 孙晨龙, 等. 高速列车油压减振器阻尼特性仿真及研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(8): 50-55.
ZHOU Suxia, LU Shujuan, SUN Chenlong, et al. Simulation and research on damping characteristics of hydraulic damper for high-speed train[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(8): 50-55.
WANG W L, YU D S, HUANG Y, et al. A locomotive’s dynamic response to in-service parameter variations of its hydraulic yaw damper[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 77(4): 1485-1502.
周素霞, 秦震, 孙晨龙, 等. 抗蛇行减振器常见故障对高速列车动力学性能的影响[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2017, 41(1): 85-91.
ZHOU Suxia, QIN Zhen, SUN Chenlong, et al. Influences of common faults of anti-yaw damper on dynamic performances of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017, 41(1): 85-91.
张立刚, 罗赟, 陈国胜. HXD1型电力机车故障态动力学性能分析[J]. 机车电传动, 2009(4): 10-12.
ZHANG Ligang, LUO Yun, CHEN Guosheng. Dynamic performance analysis of HXD1 electric locomotive in fault state[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2009(4): 10-12.
于文涛, 徐传波, 郭兆团, 等. 二系横向减振器失效故障对中国标准动车组性能的影响[J]. 中国工程机械学报, 2019, 17(3): 252-255.
YU Wentao, XU Chuanbo, GUO Zhaotuan, et al. Effect of troubles in secondary lateral damper on vehicle dynamic performance of CEMU[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2019, 17(3): 252-255.
张战东, 曾昭基. 国产准高速电力机车横向稳定性的改善[J]. 机车电传动, 2012(1): 71-72.
ZHANG Zhandong, ZENG Zhaoji. Improvement of the lateral stability of domestic quasi-high speed electric locomotive[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2012(1): 71-72.
冯征, 杨亮亮, 罗世辉. 某C0-C0机车二系横向减振器对横向平稳性的影响[J]. 机车电传动, 2016(2): 15-17.
FENG Zheng, YANG Liangliang, LUO Shihui. Influence of a C0-C0 locomotive secondary lateral damper on the lateral stability[J]. Electric Drive for Locomotives, 2016(2): 15-17.
SILVEIRA M, WAHI P, FERNANDES J C M. Effects of asymmetrical damping on a 2 DOF quarter-car model under harmonic excitation[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2017, 43: 14-24.
杨岳, 张晓峰, 张兆丰, 等. 面向运行平稳性的铁道车辆悬挂参数灵敏度分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2014, 11(2): 116-120.
YANG Yue, ZHANG Xiaofeng, ZHANG Zhaofeng, et al. Sensitivity analysis of railway vehicle suspension parameters on riding stability[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2014, 11(2): 116-120.
赵雷雷, 于曰伟, 周长城, 等. 物流车座椅减振器双向比对人-椅冲击动力学行为的影响[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2018, 41(6): 14-19.
ZHAO Leilei, YU Yuewei, ZHOU Changcheng, et al. Effect of seat damper bidirectional ratio on impact dynamic behaviors of human-seat for logistic vehicles[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2018, 41(6): 14-19.
POLACH O, BÖTTCHER A. A new approach to define criteria for rail vehicle model validation[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2014, 52(Suppl 1): 125-141.
刘宏友, 高常君, 王云鹏, 等. 160 km/h快捷货车转向架蛇行失稳临界速度的确定方法[J]. 铁道车辆, 2017, 55(6): 1-5.
LIU Hongyou, GAO Changjun, WANG Yunpeng, et al. Method to determine the critical hunting speed of bogies for 160 km/h rapid freight cars[J]. Rolling Stock, 2017, 55(6): 1-5.
0
浏览量
22
下载量
0
CSCD
1
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构